Recently we’ve written an investigation paper and posted a preprint regarding the Arxiv to have some non-official peer review and also to raise the quality of y our paper. Till now we’ve maybe perhaps not submitted this paper to virtually any meeting or log (it’s unpublished), but we’re thinking about sending it up to a seminar.
While testing our paper for plagiarism utilizing free web sites, we obtained outcomes showing 83% plagiarism through the variation we posted regarding the Arxiv. The software is saying that we plagiarised our own paper in other words. We additionally attempted pulling straight down our paper through the Arxiv to prevent this plagiarism, however it’s extremely hard. Does that suggest our paper shall get refused by all conferences? Exactly exactly What should we do?
This concern originated from our web web site for expert mathematicians.
3 Responses 3
The specific situation as it is understood by me:
A manuscript was written by you A and uploaded it into the arXiv. That you do not intend to publish manuscript the in a journal or conference.
You later on published a manuscript B. You intend to submit B to a meeting. This manuscript B shows 83% overlap with manuscript A.
Therefore, you may be concerned to own issues with publishing manuscript B.
While both are your projects there was a risk that is potential may think you might be committing self-plagiarism. (As in the event that you can you make an effort to publish both the and B in a journal or conference there might be a genuine problem.) to prevent this perception the status should be made by you of a definite.
You are able to do this via:
Including a footnote into the front web page of a saying that it really is a report/etc that is draft/technical. and never designed for book. Weiterlesen